"Andthe storybook comes to a close,
Gone are the ribbons and bows . . . ."
--from Pretty Maids All in a Row, theEagles
Joey Vitale and Joe Walsh
Inthe year 2000, she was the undisputed new darling of the British entertainmentworld, and rightfully so.
Shewas Justine Waddell, a strikingly beautiful Scotch-English Cambridge studentwho had taken time off from her studies to perform brilliantly as the starringingénue in a succession of superb television dramatizations of nineteenthcentury literary classics and other distinguished productions.
Inher first appearance on the screen, she literally glowed in the title role asthe ethereal, mentally mysterious adolescent, Millie, in Catherine Cookson's The Moth. In an auspicious opening scene, she emergedfrom out of the night like an angelic visitation in a glowing white hoodedcloak, seeming to float through the air in a hauntingly gorgeous vision likethe very embodiment of Claire de Lune. After a subordinate role as Countess Nordstonin a film version of Anna Karenina,she played the innocent and vulnerable victim of a diabolical,switched-identity murder plot in Wilkie Collins' masterpiece, The Woman in White. Waddell's soft-spoken, low-key character wasovershadowed by Tara Fitzgerald's portrayal of the novel's resolute ladyavenger, but Waddell played her supporting part in the submissive, yetappealing, tone demanded by the story.
Justine Waddell, unforgettably beautiful as Tess of the D'Urbervilles
Ms.Waddell then advanced to a pair of moving and memorable starring roles in twoof the most beautifully produced and acted period pieces that have ever graceda television screen.
Therehave been numerous television and cinema productions of Hardy's great tragicnovel, Tess of the D'urbervilles, butA&E's 1998 presentation stands out as a genuine masterpiece of qualitytelevision drama. From her opening scenewith a bevy of white-gowned dairy maidens dancing in a pastoral rite ofspring, to her tragic exit in the shadows of Stonehenge, Ms. Waddell's luminous beauty and simmering dramatic convictionproduced a perfect portrayal of the iconic Tess against the lush backdrop of the Wessex landscape. In an unusually demanding andphysical role that placed the young actress center-screen for nearly the entirethree-hour production, Waddell conveyed the doomed milkmaid's pastoralinnocence, suppressed passion, and enormous moral fortitude and strength in amagnificent performance that would have been a delight to Thomas Hardy himself(who was said to have been enamored of his own lovely literary creation). An excerpt of one of her more riveting scenes from the film is embedded below.
A compelling excerpt from Ms. Waddell's stellar portrayal of Tess in the A&Eproduction
AlthoughWaddell's sublime performance in Tessdid not receive the widespread public attention it deserved – Tess's relentlesslytragic story might be a bit too grim for contemporary audiences -- her nextleading part certainly did. Hersparkling role as the irresistible Molly Gibson (one critic was so smitten shesaid you "could eat her with a spoon") in the BBC's mini-seriesproduction of Elizabeth Gaskell's classic Wivesand Daughters proved a smashing and celebrated success with Britishviewers, as well as the critics. Theshow was deservedly showered with prestigious awards, including a Broadcasters'Guild Best Actress award for Ms. Waddell.
Surroundedby a stellar and seasoned ensemble cast that included a virtual A-list of theBritish acting elite – Michael Gambon, Keeley Hawes, Rosamond Pike, IanCarmichael, Tom Hollander, and many others – Waddell still managed to somehowsteal the show with her appealing portrayal of a genuinely attractive andnoble heroine. In a video"short" feature on the making of the mini-series, fellow cast memberBill Paterson (who played Molly Gibson's father) explained the unusual appealof Ms. Waddell's Molly: "Molly isone of the best human beings I suppose you can come across in literature. . .. Something saintly comes out of her,but not cloying."
Gracing Harperscover after her Wives and Daughters triumph
Afterthe spectacular success of Wives andDaughters, the sky seemed the limit for Ms. Waddell. A wave of laudatory publicity and acclaim followed,including cover stories in chic magazines like Harpers and Queen. Meanwhile, theU.S. broadcast of the popular mini-seriesbrought the classy British starlet to the favorable attention of American audiences.
Justine Waddell possessed every quality one would expect in a serious, thoughtful, and glamorous actressof the first order. She seemed destined to become one of the genuinelyaccomplished and classy superstars of her era – rather a brunette British versionof Grace Kelly.
Waddell as a spot-on Natalie Wood in the TV bio-pic
Physicalbeauty is commonplace in the acting profession, but the chestnut-haired Ms.Waddell's stunning, delicately-featured visage stood out even in that brilliantcompany. A slim, wasp-waisted 5-foot-7, shehad the easy, athletic grace of a Hepburn – whether Katherine or Aubrey (who were,interestingly, both the same height as Waddell). But the most conclusive proof ofher truly extaordinary beauty is this: shewas selected to portray the illustrious Natalie Wood -- who has been accuratelydescribed as the most beautiful actress of her era -- in Ms. Wood's televisedbio-pic, and the reviewers were astonished at the spot-on likeness of Ms.Waddell's portrayal. Her successful rolesalso included some of the most iconic "beauty parts" in literature,including the man-killer Estella in Dickens' Great Expectations and the lovely embodiment of the "child ofnature" she portrayed in Hardy's Tess.
Superiorintelligence and scholarship, on the other hand, are not commonly found in the acting world, any more than they arecommonplace elsewhere. But JustineWaddell managed to earn her B. Phil. in Political Science and Sociology atCambridge University's elite Emmanuel College, even while she was meeting ademanding schedule of film and theatrical engagements. Moreover, Waddell performed her demandingliterary roles with an intelligence and sensitivity that clearly reflected theunderstanding she had gained from actually reading and grasping the novels inquestion. And her refreshinglythoughtful responses to interviewers' questions (see below) reflected anincisive and original mind that is rare in the often superficial circles of theentertainment world.
Superior dramatictalent also seemed to come naturally to Ms. Waddell. Wholly apart from serious television dramas,she simultaneously developed her acting skills in the demanding arena of theBritish live theatre, where she excelled.She earned "sensational reviews," as well as a nomination for anIan Charleson theatrical award, for her role in the Royal Shakespeare Company's productionof Chekhov's The Seagull, and alsoexcelled in the London presentation of Chekhov's Ivanov. One need only viewseveral of the excerpts from her performances in Tess and Wives and Daughters,published on YouTube, to recognize this lady's exceptional dramatic ability.
Waddell as emergent beauty Molly Gibson in "Wives and Daughters"
Finally– and most importantly to SR – Justine Waddell appeared to possess a refreshingsense of decency and moral integrity not commonly found among stunninglybeautiful British celebrity actresses.It was not merely that all of the roles that led to her stardom as aprincess of the costume drama could be described as edifying and admirable –the kind of performances one would be quite comfortable viewing with one's teenagedaughters. Although there is much to be said for that factor alone in this era of general cinematicdepravity. More tellingly, in aninterview with the BBC ("Justine Waddell Plays Molly Gibson") regardingher celebrated role as Molly Gibson in Wivesand Daughters, Ms. Waddell offered some interesting comments lamenting the sexual precociousness of contemporary teenagers:
"The other attraction for the actress was the character's purity. 'Molly
is very caring about people' Waddell says. 'It's good that she takes people on
trust. I like the fact that she is old-fashioned and sexually naive, too -- she
doesn't give a damn about what she looks like. Nowadays teenagers are so
sexually precocious; we've lost that sense of childish innocence."
Thesepersonal qualities did not arise mysteriously out of whole cloth. On the contrary, Justine Waddell was blessedwith superlative genes and what must have been a highly educational and cosmopolitanupbringing. Her father was GordonWaddell, also a Cambridge graduate, who had been the captain and star rugbyplayer for the Scottish national team.He was also a member of the South African Parliament – Ms. Waddell wasborn in Johannesburg and lived there until she was eleven -- where he was astaunch opponent of apartheid. Mr.Waddell was also a prominent and successful international businessman.
Givenall this, one would need to search hard indeed to find an actress with greaterpromise and prospects than those facing Justine Waddell at the turn of the lastcentury.
Butjust when she seemed so surely destined for an illustrious and positive career,something went wrong. Seriously wrong –at least professionally.
Around the turn of the century, shemade an abrupt transition from the refined precincts of serious literary periodpieces and costume dramas to the crass and crude arena of the big-screen cinema.Perhaps she felt the need to step out of the Victorian confines ofhigh-waisted gowns and drawing rooms, to explore the brave new world of latex-suited"action girls." Whatever themotivation, the change of scenery and sensibility just didn't work for Ms. Waddell.
Herfirst foray into a big-screen starring role was in what seemed like thehundredth remake of the increasingly tiresome Dracula saga – in thiscase, what was first dubbed as Wes Craven's presentation of "Dracula 2000." The new twist of this version was that theubiquitous vampire (played by Gerard Butler, later to gain superstardom as the sculpted Spartan-king of300 fame) was presented as thereincarnation of Judas Iscariot, who preened and "vamped" indetermined pursuit of the virginal Mary Heller (Waddell's role), the daughter of an hereditary vampire slayer. Although the movie gave Waddell the"opportunity" to emerge from nineteenth century gowns and drawing rooms as a 21stcentury vampire slayer, it was otherwise a popular and critical bust. Her venture into the vampire world did more to dim her star, rather than brighten it.
Afterthe Dracula fiasco, this talented and lovely A-list actress inexplicably descendedinto what can only be described as a netherworld of flawed and failingfilms. Starting with a British-maderomantic comedy bust (The One and Only),descending through several profoundly awful "action" thrillers thatthrilled no one (Chaos and Thr3e), and then meandering into abizarre art film in which Waddell presented an exotically gorgeous image for the cameras in a stunningChinese-empress-inspired costume, but had little to say dramatically orotherwise (The Fall) – Ms. Waddell'schoice of roles seemed to go from bad to worse.
More recently, she has found herself in secondary roles in such dubious productions as something called Killing Bono(about a British rock group frustrated by their inability to match the rise of U2) and The Enemy Within(a German-produced docu-drama about the career of the much maligned anti-communist U.S. Senator Joe McCarthy).
Itmight not have been so depressing if the elegant Ms. Waddell had merely beenvictimized by unfortunate roles in awful films.But it was worse than that.
Perhaps motivated by her evident intellectual curiosity and adventuresome cultural tastes, Waddell accepted a role in a futuristic, semi-sci-fi Russian-made film about a group of jaded Russian elitists who pursue a source of extreme rejuvenation at an abandoned radiation-collection site in the Mongolian outlands. Waddell learned to speak Russian in preparation for this strange film (released in 2011), but apparently not well enough to speak her own lines, which were dubbed by a native Russian woman. The film purports to be in the art film genre, and bears certain rough parallels in its relentlessly depressing plot to Anna Karenina(Waddell's character falls into doomed adultery with a swaggering horse-lover and commits suicide by high-diving into the path of a train). Wholly apart from the film's dramatic flaws and commercial obscurity, Ms. Waddell inexplicably made an abrupt and regrettable deviation from the admirable personal modesty of her prior film career. To put it as delicately as possible, she appears in scenes which would have made Molly Gibson blush crimson and which we can only hope were filmed with the assistance of a body-double. It would be bad enough had Ms. Waddell stooped to such embarrassing scenes in a prestigious cinematic masterpiece; to have made them in an obscure Russian misadventure is doubly depressing, especially for those who fell in love with her charming and edifying portrayals of demure heroines like Molly Gibson.
MeasuringMs. Waddell's beauty, brains, and acting credentials against the succession ofawful films in which she found herself cast upon moving into big-screen cinema, one can only remark: What was her manager thinking? In today's cultural wasteland, genuinetheatrical treasures like Waddell are depressingly rare, and the career of one of the veryfinest of her generation was literally being wasted on a succession of sordidor superficial cinematic disasters. Itwould not take a theatrical genius to recognize that these crass or bizarre productionswould not provide a flattering showcase for an elegant and edifying talent such as Waddell's.
Onthe other hand, it is difficult to imagine that a deeply intelligent, highlyeducated, independent woman like Ms. Waddell would defer to her manager oragent in setting the direction of her movie career. It is possible that she was completely indifferent to a career of conventional film stardom, and deliberately bypassed more popular, commercially oriented roles in favor of more original or adventuresome productions. But a moment's consideration undermines that proposition; the films in which she appeared on abandoning the refined world of the costume drama were so consistently awful that it is most unlikely that a lady of Ms. Waddell's intelligence would deliberately seek them, given reasonable alternatives.
Oneis ultimately left to hazard a depressing explanation for Justine Waddell'sdisappointing "fade-out" from the heights of early stardom inbeautiful and edifying period pieces to lesser roles in the netherworld of vacuouscontemporary film flops. The world of popular culture and cinema in the 21stcentury places a premium on the vulgar, the vacuous, and the sexually provocative. The very qualities that enabled Ms. Waddell to portray virtuous nineteenth century heroines with such conviction, intelligence, and authenticity were likely incompatible with the tasteless and superficial priorities of those who control the boorish star-making machinery of these cultural dark ages. Waddell may have been relegated to the cinematic obscurity in which she found herself simply by the philistene tastes of the times.
Sadly, to paraphase the Eagles' song, "Gone are the ribbons and bows" of Justine Waddell's early triumphs in the costume dramas and period pieces of quality television drama. But fortunately for those who appreciate such cultural treasures, they will be preserved and appreciated in the proper places long after her unfortunate misadventures on the big screen are quietly forgotten.
